Senior Managers and the AI Learning Curve

Liked this post? Share with others!

๐†๐ž๐ง๐ž๐ซ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐€๐ˆ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐จ๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ซ ๐ž๐ฆ๐ž๐ซ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ญ๐ž๐œ๐ก๐ง๐จ๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ข๐ž๐ฌ (AI in general, digital platforms, blockchain, 3-D printing, etc.) pose a problem for ๐ฌ๐ž๐ง๐ข๐จ๐ซ ๐ฆ๐š๐ง๐š๐ ๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ. These technologies have far-reaching capabilities (partially surpassing those of humans) and are evolving rapidly, but they also come with significant risks. Senior managers, who have built their ๐ž๐ฑ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐ฌ๐ž and associated ๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ญ๐ฎ๐ฌ over the years, are expected to understand these technologies, yet they have limited time to do so, and the risks of failure are high.

One strategy is for senior managers to ๐ฅ๐ž๐š๐ซ๐ง ๐Ÿ๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ง๐ข๐จ๐ซ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐Ÿ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ๐ฌ. However, a Harvard Business School study experimented with 78 junior consultants from BCG to evaluate this approach. The juniors, who had limited experience with generative AI outside of the work setting, were asked to solve a business problem using GPT-4 and then suggest tactics to educate their seniors. The study found that the ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ง๐ข๐จ๐ซ๐ฌ’ ๐ญ๐š๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐œ๐ฌ ๐Ÿ๐ž๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ซ๐ญ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ซ๐ž๐ž ๐ค๐ž๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐š๐ฒ๐ฌ:

  • The juniors ๐ฅ๐š๐œ๐ค๐ž๐ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐ข๐œ๐ข๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ง๐๐ข๐ง๐  of how to mitigate the three key risks associated with generative AI: accuracy, explainability, and contextualization (taking into account context).
  • They ๐จ๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ž๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ž๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐œ๐ก๐š๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ก๐ฎ๐ฆ๐š๐ง ๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐ž๐ฌ (e.g., improved prompting, training users to validate results, etc.) and underestimated the potential of system design changes (e.g., automatic monitoring, fine-tuning, RAG for context, hard-coded restrictions, etc.).
  • Their risk mitigation tactics were ๐Ÿ๐จ๐œ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ž๐ ๐š๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฃ๐ž๐œ๐ญ ๐ฅ๐ž๐ฏ๐ž๐ฅ (where they work), missing the bigger picture involving broader frameworks, promoting communication, prompt libraries, audit tools, evaluation metrics, user interfaces, task allocation (between humans and AI systems), updated training data, etc.

The study implies that senior managers have limited options: they must either engage real experts or allocate time to gain personal experience with emerging technologies, despite the risks. I believe the alternative is worse: failing to do so could lead to a swift erosion of both the company’s competitiveness and the managers’ relevance.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Collect visitorโ€™s submissions and store it directly in your Elementor account, or integrate your favorite marketing & CRM tools.

Do you want to boost your business today?

This is your chance to invite visitors to contact you. Tell them youโ€™ll be happy to answer all their questions as soon as possible.

Learn how we helped 100 top brands gain success

Learn how we helped 100 top brands gain success

Learn how we helped 100 top brands gain success